- BNP Indian Wells Premium Package Now On-Sale including NOBU
- Ricky’s picks for the 2025 United Cup
- Simona Halep Withdraws from Australian Open Qualifying
- Alex de Minaur and Katie Boulter are Engaged!
- Fonseca wins NextGen, hopes to continue legacy of past champions
- Ricky’s picks for the 2025 Nitto ATP Finals field
- Jenson Brooksby Opens Up on Living with Autism
- Players React to Jakub Menšík Mid-Match Doping Test
- Roland Garros Reveals 2025 Tennis Poster Art
- Simona Halep Receives Australian Open Qualifying Wild Card
- Happy Holidays from 10sBalls Team: Our Wish For You and Yours!
- Sabalenka, Swiatek, Paolini Commit to Dubai Tournament
- Ricky’s picks for the 2024 NextGen ATP Finals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
- Tennis Star Genie Bouchard suffers An Eye Injury Playing Pickleball
- Stringlet: Serving Up Tennis Inspiration With A Twist
Tennis Anti-Doping Programme Statement Regarding Alize Cornet
- Updated: January 24, 2018
Alize Cornet of France in action during her second round match against Julia Goerges of Germany at the Australian Open Grand Slam tennis tournament in Melbourne, Australia, 17 January 2018. EPA-EFE/LUKAS COCH
Tennis Anti-Doping Programme
PRESS STATEMENT
25 January 2018
Tennis Anti-Doping Programme statement regarding Alize Cornet
Following the statement made by Alize Cornet, the Tennis Anti-Doping Programme (TADP) confirms the following:
Ms. Cornet has been charged with a violation of TADP Article 2.4 (Failing three times in any 12-month period…to be available for Testing at the declared whereabouts in accordance with Article I.4 of the International Standard for Testing and Investigations (a “Missed Test”)).
Ms. Cornet was charged with the above violation on 11 January 2018.
In accordance with the TADP rules, no further comment will be made pending determination of the case, except as may be necessary to respond to public comment by Ms. Cornet or her representatives. In that regard, the TADP points out that, contrary to the implication in Ms. Cornet’s statement that the ‘valuable reasons’ for her unavailability for testing at her declared whereabouts went unheard, the process set out in the International Standard for Testing and Investigations for the management of Whereabouts Failures, which includes the right for the player to request an independent assessment of whether the requirements for such failures were met, was followed in all three instances.